All GLP-1 medications from licensed 503A compounding pharmacies Browse Products

Originally posted by @cbsmornings on TikTok · 112s|Watch on TikTok
Full video transcriptClick to expand

Auto-generated transcript of @cbsmornings's video. Quoted here for educational fact-check commentary; original creator retains all rights to the video content.

  1. 0:00Would a pill be considered more effective or certainly easier to use?
  2. 0:04Well, I think that's really the game changer here,
  3. 0:06is that it's easier to use.
  4. 0:08You know, with the injectables, you need needles,
  5. 0:10you need to build a refrigerate.
  6. 0:12What's great about the pills is it's a lot cheaper to manufacture a pill.
  7. 0:17It's a lot easier to take.
  8. 0:18And there are no restrictions around you have to take it with water,
  9. 0:22with food, you can take it at any time of day.
  10. 0:25So this will make it a lot more accessible to people,
  11. 0:28both in terms of cost, as well as convenience.
  12. 0:30Is it just as effective?
  13. 0:32Well, so the Eli Lilly trial data that they put out,
  14. 0:36has not been peer reviewed and published yet,
  15. 0:38but what they put out in a press release
  16. 0:40says that in their phase three clinical trial,
  17. 0:42what they call detain one,
  18. 0:44people who took the highest dose of or for glipron,
  19. 0:47this is the pill form of these medications,
  20. 0:50they lost an average of 27 pounds over 72 weeks.
  21. 0:54And that's really on par with what we see
  22. 0:56with the injectable forms of these drugs.
  23. 0:59Now, if this announcement was packaged in commercial form
  24. 1:01at the very end of the BIO whisper with the side effects.
  25. 1:04So the question is, are there any side effects?
  26. 1:07Well, there are, as you have with the injectable form too,
  27. 1:11there are mostly GI side effects.
  28. 1:12So nausea, vomiting, some people have diureas,
  29. 1:14and people have constipation.
  30. 1:16About 10% of people who were taking the highest dose,
  31. 1:19which is also what got you that high level of weight loss,
  32. 1:2210% of people who took that highest dose,
  33. 1:24that were unable to continue, had to stop due to the side effects.
  34. 1:28So when can you get it?
  35. 1:30How much will it cause?
  36. 1:31Right, costs.
  37. 1:32America wants to know.
  38. 1:33Yeah, real.
  39. 1:34Well, we anticipate that Lilly will be submitting this
  40. 1:37to the FDA for approval sometime later this year,
  41. 1:39with this medication available to consumers sometime in 2026.
  42. 1:43So next year, we do not yet know how much they're planning
  43. 1:47to price this at.
  44. 1:48Why, they just haven't told us.
  45. 1:49They haven't told us how with it.
  46. 1:51Right.

Eli Lilly's oral tirzepatide pill: what the Phase 3 data actually shows

CBS Mornings

TikTok creator

311.1K viewsWatch on TikTok

Quick answer

Orforglipron is an oral, non-peptide GLP-1 receptor agonist in Phase 3 trials, with Lilly reporting approximately 7.9% body weight reduction at the highest dose over 72 weeks in unpublished press-release data. The drug's small-molecule structure eliminates refrigeration requirements and food-timing restrictions associated with existing oral semaglutide (Rybelsus), but the GI side effect profile appears similar to the injectable GLP-1 class. FDA submission is anticipated in 2025, with potential approval and consumer availability in 2026 if the review proceeds without complications.

Video review standard

Clinical fact-check snapshot

FormBlends treats social health videos as a starting point, then checks the claim against medical context, source quality, safety limits, and whether licensed provider review belongs in the next step.

GLP-1 social video fact-checksCompounded TirzepatideProvider discussion

Evidence signal

Source-backed review

Regulatory reality

Compounded Tirzepatide access requires the right clinical path

Safety screen

Viral claims can miss contraindications, dose escalation, medication interactions, and quality-control risks.

This page currently connects to 10 source-backed evidence items through visible references or structured citation data.

PubMed evidence trail

Research sources used to frame this page

For Eli Lilly's oral tirzepatide pill: what the Phase 3 data actually shows, FormBlends checks the page topic against primary trials, systematic reviews, guidelines, and current PubMed-indexed literature where available. These citations are context, not medical advice, proof of eligibility, or a claim that every study applies to every patient.

Video claim decision path

Turn the claim into a safer next question

Direct answer

Compounded Tirzepatide should be treated as a claim to verify, then compared with evidence, safety context, and a provider review path.

Evidence check

Social clips are useful prompts, but they rarely show the full evidence base, contraindications, or dosing context.

Safety check

A viral claim can miss patient-specific risks, medication interactions, legal access, and source quality.

Next step

If the claim matches your goal, use the get-started flow to move from curiosity into a supervised prescription review.

Claim path

Keep researching this tirzepatide video claims cluster

Best for searchers deciding whether tirzepatide claims are stronger, safer, or more relevant than semaglutide claims.

Page-specific review note

What this exact clip is really saying

This FormBlends review is specific to "Eli Lilly's oral tirzepatide pill: what the Phase 3 data actually shows" from CBS Mornings. We read the clip as a GLP-1 social video fact-checks claim about Compounded Tirzepatide, then separate the useful signal from what a short social video cannot prove. The page-specific claim focus is: Orforglipron is an oral, non-peptide GLP-1 receptor agonist in Phase 3 trials, with Lilly reporting approximately 7.

The reason this review is not generic is the source wording and the canonical claim label "glp1 eli lilly the maker of zepbound and mounjaro said its experi." In this clip, the useful excerpt is: "Would a pill be considered more effective or certainly easier to use?" That wording changes the review because it points to Compounded Tirzepatide safety, access, evidence, and fit, not a one-size-fits-all protocol.

The source trail for this page is checked against Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity (2021), Effect of Continued Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo on Weight Loss Maintenance (2021), and Effect of Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Daily Liraglutide on Body Weight (2022), plus the creator's own wording. Compounded Tirzepatide still needs an eligibility review, medication-interaction screen, access check, and quality-control review before anyone treats a social clip as medical advice.

The reported 27-pound average loss equals roughly 7.
People who land here are usually trying to understand whether the Compounded Tirzepatide claim is evidence-backed, safe, and relevant to their own situation.
The strongest next step is to compare the claim with FormBlends' Compounded Tirzepatide guide, evidence notes, and provider review path before acting.

Claim verdict

The useful answer behind this video

This page is built to answer the specific claim behind the clip, then separate what is useful from what still needs clinical context. That makes the URL more than a repost: it gives Google, readers, and AI retrieval systems a concise verdict with source and safety boundaries.

Claim being checked

Orforglipron is an oral, non-peptide GLP-1 receptor agonist in Phase 3 trials, with Lilly reporting approximately 7.

FormBlends verdict

Compounded Tirzepatide safety, access, evidence, and fit

Evidence strength

Source-backed review with clinical or regulatory citations.

Patient-safe next step

Compare the claim with the Compounded Tirzepatide guide, safety notes, access rules, and a licensed-provider review.

What to do with this video

Use the clip as a claim to verify, not a treatment plan

What it helps with

  • Orforglipron is an oral, non-peptide GLP-1 receptor agonist in Phase 3 trials, with Lilly reporting approximately 7.9% body weight reduction at the highest dose over 72 weeks in unpublished press-release data. The drug's small-molecule structure eliminates refrigeration requirements and food-timing restrictions associated with existing oral semaglutide (Rybelsus), but the GI side effect profile appears similar to the injectable GLP-1 class. FDA submission is anticipated in 2025, with potential approval and consumer availability in 2026 if the review proceeds without complications.
  • Lilly's orforglipron Phase 3 data is press-release only, not yet peer-reviewed or published in a journal, meaning it has not been independently scrutinized.
  • The reported 27-pound average loss equals roughly 7.9% body weight reduction, lower than the 20-22% seen with injectable tirzepatide in SURMOUNT-1 (Jastreboff et al., 2022, NEJM).

What it may miss

  • It may not cover eligibility, contraindications, medication interactions, lab history, or dose escalation.
  • Compounded Tirzepatide decisions still need source quality, legal access, and provider oversight checks.
  • Social video captions rarely show the full evidence base behind a claim.

Best next step

Compare the claim against the Compounded Tirzepatide guide, cost path, safety notes, and provider review before acting.

Review Compounded Tirzepatide

What You'll Learn

  • Lilly's orforglipron Phase 3 data is press-release only, not yet peer-reviewed or published in a journal, meaning it has not been independently scrutinized.
  • The reported 27-pound average loss equals roughly 7.9% body weight reduction, lower than the 20-22% seen with injectable tirzepatide in SURMOUNT-1 (Jastreboff et al., 2022, NEJM).
  • Approximately 10% of participants on the highest dose discontinued due to side effects, primarily GI-related, a tolerability rate that matters for real-world use.
  • Orforglipron's small-molecule structure eliminates refrigeration and food-timing restrictions, a genuine advantage over existing oral semaglutide (Rybelsus).
  • No consumer price has been announced. Manufacturing cost savings do not guarantee lower patient costs in the US market.
  • FDA submission is expected in 2025, with potential consumer availability in 2026 if no safety signals emerge during review.
  • Needle aversion is a documented barrier to GLP-1 adoption (Hauber et al., 2016, Diabetes Care), and an oral option could expand real-world uptake if priced accessibly.

Our take · Written by FormBlends editorial team · Reviewed by FormBlends Medical Team · This is not a transcript. It is our independent review of the video above.

What did @cbsmornings actually say?

The segment covered Eli Lilly's Phase 3 trial data for orforglipron, a daily GLP-1 receptor agonist pill. The reporter said people on the highest dose lost "an average of 27 pounds over 72 weeks," called that "on par" with injectables, flagged that the data hasn't been peer-reviewed yet, noted roughly 10% of highest-dose participants stopped due to side effects, and predicted FDA submission later in 2025 with consumer availability in 2026. They also made the case that pills would be cheaper to manufacture and easier to use than injectables. No price has been announced.

This is a fairly responsible summary of a press release, and the reporter did something most health influencers skip entirely: they explicitly said the data is unpublished and unreviewed. That matters.

Does the science back this up?

The 27-pound figure is consistent with what Lilly announced, but "on par with injectables" needs more precision. Tirzepatide injections (Zepbound) produced weight loss of around 20-22% of body weight in the SURMOUNT-1 trial (Jastreboff et al., 2022, NEJM). The orforglipron press release reports roughly 7.9% body weight reduction at the highest oral dose, which is lower in percentage terms than injectable tirzepatide.

That said, orforglipron is a non-peptide small molecule, meaning it doesn't require refrigeration and can be manufactured more cheaply, points the reporter made correctly. Earlier Phase 2 data (Wharton et al., 2023, NEJM) showed dose-dependent weight loss up to 14.7% over 36 weeks at higher doses with semaglutide comparisons, suggesting the oral GLP-1 class has real efficacy. But comparing a press-release number to a peer-reviewed RCO requires caution, and the reporter's framing of "on par" oversimplifies.

What did they get wrong (or right)?

They got the caveat right. Saying the data is unreviewed and came from a press release is the correct thing to say, and it's refreshing. The side effect profile they described, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, is accurate and consistent with GLP-1 class effects documented across multiple trials (Kushner et al., 2020, Lancet).

Where the segment is loose: the claim that pills are "a lot cheaper to manufacture" is plausible chemistry, but it doesn't mean cheaper for the patient. Lilly's pricing on Zepbound and Mounjaro has faced intense criticism, and there is zero announced pricing for orforglipron. Conflating manufacturing cost with consumer cost is a meaningful error that could create false expectations. Also, the "no restrictions around food or water" claim is specific to orforglipron's profile and shouldn't be generalized to all oral GLP-1s, semaglutide tablets (Rybelsus) require fasting and water restrictions.

The 10% discontinuation rate at the highest dose is worth flagging more than the segment did. That's a clinically relevant tolerability signal, not a footnote.

What should you actually know?

Orforglipron is not approved. This is Phase 3 press-release data, the weakest form of clinical evidence outside of anecdote. Peer review exists for a reason, and GLP-1 trial histories have included surprises when full data surfaces (cardiovascular signals, for instance, took years to characterize).

The convenience argument is real. Needle aversion is a documented barrier to GLP-1 uptake (Hauber et al., 2016, Diabetes Care), and an oral option that doesn't require refrigeration could meaningfully expand access in lower-resource settings. That's a legitimate public health point.

But "accessible" and "affordable" are not the same word. Until Lilly publishes pricing, the affordability framing is speculative. Injectable GLP-1s in the US cost over $1,000 per month without insurance. Manufacturing economics don't always translate to sticker price in the American pharmaceutical market, and there's no evidence yet that they will here.

If you're a current GLP-1 user or candidate, orforglipron is not a reason to change your treatment plan today. Talk to a licensed provider about what's available now.

Interested in GLP-1 or peptide therapy?

Get matched with licensed-provider review to help decide if it is right for you.

Free Assessment

About the Creator

CBS Mornings · TikTok creator

311.1K views on this video

Eli Lilly, the maker of Zepbound and Mounjaro, said its experimental GLP-1 pill successfully helped adults with obesity lose weight in a Phase 3 trial, as the company moves closer to submitting the drug for approval from the Food and Drug Administration. In a news release Thursday, the drugmaker said the oral medication, called orforglipron, helped adults lose an average of 27.3 pounds in a 72-week trial. It is not yet clear how much it will cost.

Frequently asked questions

Quick answers based on this video and our medical team review.

What does the video say about lilly's?

Lilly's orforglipron Phase 3 data is press-release only, not yet peer-reviewed or published in a journal, meaning it has not been independently scrutinized.

What does the video say about the reported 27-pound average loss equals roughly 7.9% body weight?

The reported 27-pound average loss equals roughly 7.9% body weight reduction, lower than the 20-22% seen with injectable tirzepatide in SURMOUNT-1 (Jastreboff et al., 2022, NEJM).

What does the video say about approximately 10% of participants on the highest dose discontinued due?

Approximately 10% of participants on the highest dose discontinued due to side effects, primarily GI-related, a tolerability rate that matters for real-world use.

What does the video say about orforglipron's small-molecule structure eliminates refrigeration?

Orforglipron's small-molecule structure eliminates refrigeration and food-timing restrictions, a genuine advantage over existing oral semaglutide (Rybelsus).

What does the video say about no consumer price has been announced. manufacturing cost savings do?

No consumer price has been announced. Manufacturing cost savings do not guarantee lower patient costs in the US market.

What does the video say about fda submission?

FDA submission is expected in 2025, with potential consumer availability in 2026 if no safety signals emerge during review.

Sources & references

Citations extracted from our medical team's review. Click any citation to search PubMed.

Educational use only. This fact-check is editorial content for general information. Nothing here is medical advice. Talk to a licensed provider about your specific situation before starting, stopping, or changing any supplement, peptide, or medication regimen.

Read More on This Topic

Our written guides go deeper with dosing details, comparison tables, and medical-team reviewed protocols.

Not medical advice. This video was made by CBS Mornings, not by FormBlends. Our write-up above is an editorial review, not a medical recommendation. Talk to your doctor before making any decisions about medications or treatments.