Full video transcriptClick to expand
Auto-generated transcript of @shoorahj's video. Quoted here for educational fact-check commentary; original creator retains all rights to the video content.
- 0:01Hey, my lovelies, I want to talk to you today about something that's not a GOP one medication
- 0:05but it is something else that I suffer from and have been suffering since I went to college and that is
- 0:11ADHD
- 0:14So it wasn't until my first year of college that had a professor asked me to stay over after class and
- 0:20Asked me if I had ADHD because he wanted to let me know that there was a program there at the college for me
- 0:27And I was like I've never been tested. He suggested that I get tested and sure enough not only did I have ADHD
- 0:35I had ADD and in addition to that dyslexia for math
- 0:41so
- 0:43It led me down this journey of trying to get on medications and when I turned 50 years old I
- 0:50Could no longer take at all. I could no longer take any other type of
- 0:56Substitution for Adderall because I tried them and they didn't work
- 1:00until recently
- 1:02So I checked out Cmax and Cmax and C-Lanks
- 1:06Lank are peptides used to help and I've been
- 1:10Proven in many studies to help people with ADHD
- 1:15So needless say I was very skeptical about taking this it is used widely over in Russia
- 1:29I know that makes it even I was a little scarier, but
- 1:33It is also used in other countries and is mandatory for people that have suffered from stroke and they're trying to get their cognitive
- 1:42Restoration back in order. So I decided I was going to try it. I actually bought it
- 1:48It's sat as the nasal form it sat in our refrigerator for a couple weeks because again
- 1:53I was a little reluctant I kept reading up on it reading up on it and
- 1:57I have been using it for a month now and what I've done as
- 2:02I use it on days that I'm gonna I need to be super focused and you know
- 2:06I don't know with you, but with my ADHD some days are worse than others
- 2:10So some days I I'm the clarity is there the fog is lifted
- 2:15I don't have it and then some mornings I wake up and it's just really foggy in my head
- 2:21And after about an hour of trying to be at work
- 2:24Or even before within 30 minutes. I'm like, oh, it's gonna be one of those really hard concentration days
- 2:31so I have gotten up those days used the nasal spray and
- 2:38Within an hour I see the clarity
- 2:42the fog is lifted and
- 2:44It is great because it doesn't have those side effects. My heart doesn't race. I don't get jittery
- 2:52I don't stay up until 3 o'clock in the morning if I you know used to be when I take an Adderall or anything
- 3:00You know that was 480 HD it would keep me up at night. It would give me a headache after a while
- 3:08Give me the cotton mouth and things of that nature. I haven't noticed any of those side effects. I think one day I
- 3:15Did have a little bit of like a cold
- 3:18But I don't even know if it was the C max or if it was just my allergies. So I just
- 3:26and
- 3:27now
- 3:28Talking about this because those of you that know me if I use a product
- 3:32First of all, I'm not gonna talk about a product or do anything if I haven't used it
- 3:37And then I always like to give it at least four weeks to eight weeks before I come on here and say hey
- 3:43This is a good thing, but I do know that people with my age
- 3:47If we were diagnosed with ADHD, there's not a lot out there that you can do
- 3:52For that other than you know some of the the Adderall and and that's at my age
- 3:58It just wasn't an option anymore. So go check it out. I get it from Valhalla
- 4:04Vitality and you guys know that their peptides are just phenomenal. I get it comes from revived pharmacy
- 4:13And I have really really been impressed with this product
- 4:18And I am planning on working for another you know five to ten years
- 4:23So I have to stay on my on my game man. I got to stay up
- 4:27So this gives me a lot of hope so go out to the website check it out
- 4:32I encourage you to read up on C max on and say link and
- 4:37If you have any questions direct message me, I'll be happy to share any experience that I've had
- 4:43I'm not a medical person. I'm not a nurse a doctor or a practitioner in any way
- 4:47But I can share my personal experience with you if you have any questions
- 4:51Alright, I hope you're having a great Friday. Take care of yourself and take care of others until next time
Peptides for ADHD: what the evidence actually says
Quick answer
Semax is a synthetic ACTH analogue with documented effects on BDNF expression and catecholamine signaling in animal models, and it carries regulatory approval in Russia for ischemic stroke recovery, but it has not completed peer-reviewed RCTs in human ADHD populations by Western standards. Selank has been studied for generalized anxiety in small Russian clinical trials but similarly lacks large-scale controlled evidence for attention disorders. Both compounds are classified as unapproved drugs in the United States and are only legally accessible through compounding pharmacies, which introduces meaningful variability in purity and potency.
Video review standard
Clinical fact-check snapshot
FormBlends treats social health videos as a starting point, then checks the claim against medical context, source quality, safety limits, and whether licensed provider review belongs in the next step.
Evidence signal
Source-backed review
Regulatory reality
Access rules depend on the compound and patient situation
Safety screen
Viral claims can miss contraindications, dose escalation, medication interactions, and quality-control risks.
This page currently connects to 6 source-backed evidence items through visible references or structured citation data.
PubMed evidence trail
Research sources used to frame this page
For Peptides for ADHD: what the evidence actually says, FormBlends checks the page topic against primary trials, systematic reviews, guidelines, and current PubMed-indexed literature where available. These citations are context, not medical advice, proof of eligibility, or a claim that every study applies to every patient.
Functional Connectomic Approach to Studying Selank and Semax Effects
Small Russian fMRI study (52 healthy volunteers) of brain connectivity after Semax or Selank; mechanistic and exploratory, not a clinical efficacy trial.
PubMed
Effects of Semax on the Default Mode Network of the Brain
Small human fMRI study (24 adults) of intranasal Semax on brain networks; an imaging-marker study with no clinical outcomes, not replicated outside the originating group.
PubMed
Provider decision path
Use local research to choose a safer review path
Direct answer
Peptides for ADHD: what the evidence actually says is best used to compare access, oversight, pricing, pharmacy quality, and patient support before starting care.
Evidence check
Directory pages should connect local intent with provider standards, pharmacy transparency, and practical next steps.
Safety check
Provider quality, pharmacy source, prescribing model, and follow-up support can matter as much as the medication name.
Next step
When you are ready, the get-started flow can collect the details needed for a prescription review instead of leaving you to guess.
Helpful context before the funnel
Page-specific review note
What this exact clip is really saying
This FormBlends review is specific to "Peptides for ADHD: what the evidence actually says" from Jackie O. We read the clip as a Peptide social video fact-checks claim about Peptide social video fact-checks, then separate the useful signal from what a short social video cannot prove. The page-specific claim focus is: Semax is a synthetic ACTH analogue with documented effects on BDNF expression and catecholamine signaling in animal models, and it carries regulatory approval in Russia for ischemic stroke recovery, but it has not completed peer-reviewed RCTs in human ADHD populations by Western standards.
The reason this review is not generic is the source wording and the canonical claim label "peptides help for adhd without adderall adhd nootropics brainfog brai." In this clip, the useful excerpt is: "Hey, my lovelies, I want to talk to you today about something that's not a GOP one medication but it is something else that I suffer from and have been suffering since I went to college and that is ADHD So it wasn't until my first year of..." That wording changes the review because it points to Peptide social video fact-checks evidence, safety, and patient-fit context, not a one-size-fits-all protocol.
The source trail for this page is checked against Functional Connectomic Approach to Studying Selank and Semax Effects (2020), Effects of Semax on the Default Mode Network of the Brain (2018), and Therapeutic Peptides: Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions (2026), plus the creator's own wording. Peptide social video fact-checks decisions still need an eligibility review, medication-interaction screen, access check, and quality-control review before anyone treats a social clip as medical advice.
Claim verdict
The useful answer behind this video
This page is built to answer the specific claim behind the clip, then separate what is useful from what still needs clinical context. That makes the URL more than a repost: it gives Google, readers, and AI retrieval systems a concise verdict with source and safety boundaries.
Claim being checked
Semax is a synthetic ACTH analogue with documented effects on BDNF expression and catecholamine signaling in animal models, and it carries regulatory approval in Russia for ischemic stroke recovery, but it has not completed peer-reviewed RCTs in human ADHD populations by Western standards.
FormBlends verdict
Peptide social video fact-checks evidence, safety, and patient-fit context
Evidence strength
Source-backed review with clinical or regulatory citations.
Patient-safe next step
Compare the claim with FormBlends safety guidance and a licensed-provider review before acting.
What to do with this video
Use the clip as a claim to verify, not a treatment plan
What it helps with
- Semax is a synthetic ACTH analogue with documented effects on BDNF expression and catecholamine signaling in animal models, and it carries regulatory approval in Russia for ischemic stroke recovery, but it has not completed peer-reviewed RCTs in human ADHD populations by Western standards. Selank has been studied for generalized anxiety in small Russian clinical trials but similarly lacks large-scale controlled evidence for attention disorders. Both compounds are classified as unapproved drugs in the United States and are only legally accessible through compounding pharmacies, which introduces meaningful variability in purity and potency.
- Semax is approved by the Russian Ministry of Health for ischemic stroke recovery but carries no FDA approval for any indication, including ADHD.
- Animal studies (Dolotov et al., 2006, Neuroscience) show semax increases BDNF in frontal cortex and hippocampus, which is relevant to attention, but human ADHD trials are absent from major indexed literature.
What it may miss
- It may not cover eligibility, contraindications, medication interactions, lab history, or dose escalation.
- Compound access, legal status, and product quality still need a separate safety check.
- Social video captions rarely show the full evidence base behind a claim.
Best next step
Compare the claim against a FormBlends guide, safety page, and licensed-provider review before acting.
Start provider reviewWhat You'll Learn
- Semax is approved by the Russian Ministry of Health for ischemic stroke recovery but carries no FDA approval for any indication, including ADHD.
- Animal studies (Dolotov et al., 2006, Neuroscience) show semax increases BDNF in frontal cortex and hippocampus, which is relevant to attention, but human ADHD trials are absent from major indexed literature.
- Selank's clinical evidence base is primarily anxiolytic, not attention-focused, and derives from small Russian trials without large-scale replication (Semenova et al., 2010, CNS Drug Reviews).
- Compounded peptides from U.S. pharmacies are not subject to the same FDA manufacturing oversight as approved drugs, meaning purity and dosing consistency are not guaranteed.
- At least four FDA-approved non-stimulant ADHD medications exist for adults, including atomoxetine and viloxazine, making the claim that older adults have few options besides Adderall factually incorrect.
- Intranasal semax delivery has documented CNS uptake via the olfactory pathway (Manchenko et al., 2012, Neurochemical Journal), so a faster subjective effect compared to oral routes is biologically plausible but not proven in controlled human trials.
- A four-week open-label personal experience, however sincere, cannot rule out placebo response and should not be treated as evidence of efficacy for a clinical condition like ADHD.
Our take · Written by FormBlends editorial team · Reviewed by FormBlends Medical Team · This is not a transcript. It is our independent review of the video above.
What did @shoorahj actually say?
The creator says she stopped tolerating Adderall and other stimulant substitutes around age 50 and turned to two peptide nasal sprays, semax and selank, sourced through Valhalla Vitality and compounded at Revived Pharmacy. She reports that within 30 to 60 minutes of dosing on high-brain-fog days, she notices clearer thinking and less mental fog, without heart racing, jitteriness, insomnia, or cotton mouth. She calls them "proven in many studies" to help people with ADHD and notes that they are used clinically in Russia and mandated for stroke-related cognitive recovery in some countries. She is not a medical professional and says so clearly, framing everything as personal experience.
Does the science back this up?
Partially, but the evidence base is narrow and almost entirely preclinical or Russian-language. That matters a lot. Semax is a synthetic analogue of ACTH(4-7), originally developed in Russia in the 1980s. It does have documented effects on brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and dopaminergic signaling, which are relevant to attention and executive function. Selank is a synthetic analogue of tuftsin and has been studied primarily for anxiolytic effects. Neither has completed a randomized controlled trial in ADHD populations that meets Western regulatory standards.
- Dolotov et al. (2006, Neuroscience) showed semax increased BDNF expression in rat hippocampus and frontal cortex, regions relevant to attention regulation.
- Volkova et al. (2016, Molecular Biology) documented semax effects on serotonin and dopamine transporter expression in animal models, but human translation is unconfirmed.
- Semenova et al. (2010, CNS Drug Reviews) reviewed selank's anxiolytic and nootropic properties in Russian clinical settings, noting small-scale positive findings but no large-scale placebo-controlled trials.
The phrase "proven in many studies" overstates the current evidence considerably. Small Russian studies are not the same as replicated, peer-reviewed Phase III trials.
What did they get wrong (or right)?
She got the Russia origin right, and the stroke rehabilitation use is accurate for semax specifically, which is approved by the Russian Ministry of Health for ischemic stroke recovery. The claim that these peptides are "proven in many studies" to help ADHD is where she overshoots. There are no published human RCTs specifically in ADHD populations in any major indexed journal. The mechanism is plausible, the preliminary data is interesting, but calling it proven is inaccurate by any standard scientific definition.
She also deserves credit for what she did not claim. She did not say these peptides cure ADHD. She did not recommend a specific dose. She disclosed her source, acknowledged her non-medical status, and framed the results as her own experience after four weeks of use. That level of transparency is not common in this content category. Her subjective report of faster mental clarity on symptomatic days is plausible given semax's proposed mechanism, but placebo effect at four weeks cannot be ruled out without a controlled comparison.
What should you actually know?
Semax and selank are not FDA-approved for any indication. In the United States, they can only be obtained through compounding pharmacies operating under specific regulatory conditions. The quality, purity, and dosing consistency of compounded peptides vary by pharmacy and are not held to the same manufacturing standards as FDA-approved drugs. Anyone considering these compounds should know that long-term human safety data is essentially absent in peer-reviewed literature outside of small Russian trials.
For adults over 50 who cannot tolerate stimulant medications, there are FDA-approved non-stimulant options including atomoxetine (Strattera), viloxazine (Qelbree), and guanfacine (Intuniv) that have documented safety profiles in adults. The claim that there is "not a lot out there" besides Adderall for older adults with ADHD is not accurate, and anyone in that situation should speak with a psychiatrist before turning to compounded peptides as a first alternative.
If you are curious about semax or selank, a licensed prescriber familiar with peptide pharmacology should be part of that conversation, not a TikTok comment section.
Interested in GLP-1 or peptide therapy?
Get matched with licensed-provider review to help decide if it is right for you.
About the Creator
Jackie O · TikTok creator
4.4K views on this video
Help for ADHD without Adderall #adhd #nootropics #brainfog #brainfogproblems #brainfoglifted #valhallavitality #peptide
Frequently asked questions
Quick answers based on this video and our medical team review.
What does the video say about semax?
Semax is approved by the Russian Ministry of Health for ischemic stroke recovery but carries no FDA approval for any indication, including ADHD.
What does the video say about animal studies (dolotov et al., 2006, neuroscience) show semax increases?
Animal studies (Dolotov et al., 2006, Neuroscience) show semax increases BDNF in frontal cortex and hippocampus, which is relevant to attention, but human ADHD trials are absent from major indexed literature.
What does the video say about selank's clinical evidence base?
Selank's clinical evidence base is primarily anxiolytic, not attention-focused, and derives from small Russian trials without large-scale replication (Semenova et al., 2010, CNS Drug Reviews).
What does the video say about compounded peptides from u.s. pharmacies?
Compounded peptides from U.S. pharmacies are not subject to the same FDA manufacturing oversight as approved drugs, meaning purity and dosing consistency are not guaranteed.
What does the video say about at least four fda-approved non-stimulant adhd medications exist for adults,?
At least four FDA-approved non-stimulant ADHD medications exist for adults, including atomoxetine and viloxazine, making the claim that older adults have few options besides Adderall factually incorrect.
What does the video say about intranasal semax delivery has documented cns uptake via the olfactory?
Intranasal semax delivery has documented CNS uptake via the olfactory pathway (Manchenko et al., 2012, Neurochemical Journal), so a faster subjective effect compared to oral routes is biologically plausible but not proven in controlled human trials.
Sources & references
Citations extracted from our medical team's review. Click any citation to search PubMed.
Read More on This Topic
Our written guides go deeper with dosing details, comparison tables, and medical-team reviewed protocols.
Not medical advice. This video was made by Jackie O, not by FormBlends. Our write-up above is an editorial review, not a medical recommendation. Talk to your doctor before making any decisions about medications or treatments.