What did @robertmalagisi actually say?
The creator pitched semax and selank as cognitive "cheat codes" for entrepreneurs, describing them as easy intranasal sprays that will get you "so fucking dialed." Then he escalated: add a Celsius energy drink, throw in some Adderall, and you have a four-way stack he calls the path to elite productivity. He never named a dose, a source, or a single study. He closed by suggesting viewers just "do your own research" to find these compounds.
To be direct: this is a hype reel, not health information. Two of the four substances he mentioned (semax and selank) are research peptides with genuinely interesting early data. One (Celsius) is just a caffeinated drink. And one, Adderall, is a Schedule II controlled substance. Lumping all four together as a casual productivity stack is where this goes from enthusiastic to actually risky.
Does the science back this up?
Semax and selank have real, if early-stage, research behind them, primarily from Russian and Eastern European clinical literature. The "cheat code" framing is not what the studies show, but dismissing the compounds entirely would also be inaccurate.
Semax is a synthetic analogue of ACTH(4-7) that has been studied for neuroprotection and cognitive effects. Dolotov et al. (2006, Journal of Molecular Neuroscience) found it modulates brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression in rodent models, which is relevant to learning and memory. Human data is thin and mostly from Russian-language studies on stroke recovery, not healthy entrepreneur optimization.
Selank is a synthetic analogue of tuftsin with anxiolytic properties studied in Russia. Zozulya et al. (2014, Drugs in R&D) found it reduced anxiety comparably to benzodiazepines in some measures without sedation in a clinical sample. That is interesting. It is not a productivity drug, though. It is closer to an anti-anxiety compound, which could indirectly help focus if anxiety is the limiting factor.
Neither compound has been approved by the FDA. Neither has large-scale randomized controlled trial data in healthy adults chasing business productivity.
What did they get wrong (or right)?
Credit where it is due: semax and selank are not pseudoscience. They have more legitimate research behind them than most peptides discussed on TikTok. The intranasal delivery route he mentions is also consistent with how these compounds are typically administered in the literature, since intranasal delivery can bypass the blood-brain barrier more efficiently than oral routes for certain peptides.
But the stack recommendation is a serious problem. Casually suggesting viewers add Adderall to a semax-selank-caffeine combination is not optimization advice. It is a recipe for cardiovascular strain and potential psychiatric risk. Adderall is amphetamine. Combining stimulants, even legal ones, increases heart rate, blood pressure, and the risk of anxiety, psychosis triggers, and dependency. There is no published literature studying this specific four-way combination. The creator offers zero dosing guidance, zero contraindication warnings, and zero acknowledgment that Adderall requires a prescription for a reason.
Saying "just do your own research" when recommending a Schedule II controlled substance to 271,000 viewers is not responsible content creation. That framing shifts liability while the risk stays with the viewer.
What should you actually know?
If semax or selank genuinely interest you, the honest picture is this: the early data is intriguing enough that researchers are still studying them. They are not approved medications in the United States. Compounded versions are available through some telehealth platforms, but quality control varies significantly and you should only use them under medical supervision with a provider who has actually read the literature.
The anxiolytic effects of selank are probably the most reproducible finding across the available studies. If chronic stress or anxiety is blunting your focus, there is a plausible mechanism there. Semax as a nootropic for healthy adults is much less supported than its neuroprotective data in acute injury models.
The Adderall recommendation in this video should be ignored entirely if you do not have a legitimate ADHD diagnosis and prescription. Stimulant misuse for productivity is well-documented as a path toward tolerance, withdrawal, sleep disruption, and in some cases, more serious cardiovascular and psychiatric events. Moran et al. (2019, Journal of Clinical Psychiatry) documented significant rates of misuse-related adverse events in young adults. No peptide stack changes that risk profile.
The bottom line on regulatory and safety status
Semax and selank are not FDA-approved. They are not legal to market as drugs in the United States. MK-677 is also referenced in the video's category context and remains similarly unapproved. Adderall is a Schedule II controlled substance. A telehealth provider who recommends this stack as described in this video without a full intake, contraindication screening, and legitimate ADHD evaluation is not practicing responsibly. A TikTok creator who does it in 60 seconds is doing something worse.
- Semax: research compound, not FDA-approved, some legitimate neuroscience data
- Selank: research compound, not FDA-approved, anxiolytic data is its strongest finding
- Celsius: caffeinated energy drink, no meaningful therapeutic effect beyond caffeine
- Adderall: Schedule II controlled substance, illegal without a prescription, real cardiovascular and psychiatric risks when misused