All GLP-1 medications from licensed 503A compounding pharmacies Browse Products

Originally posted by @kodi_dyel on TikTok · 63s|Watch on TikTok
Full video transcriptClick to expand

Auto-generated transcript of @kodi_dyel's video. Quoted here for educational fact-check commentary; original creator retains all rights to the video content.

  1. 0:00What are my favorite peptides when it comes to bulking versus cutting? Well, let's talk about this.
  2. 0:04Also, if everything goes great, hopefully my company will be up and running and under 30 days,
  3. 0:08you guys are gonna be able to get some good shit and some crazy blends that nobody else has. In the cutting world,
  4. 0:13though, my go-tos usually clan T3, T4, any type of abuteral, a fred drain, any type of tesum rounds also great,
  5. 0:20retitrutide, ozemic, and of course tricepatide, all very good at fat burning and or being appetites suppressant,
  6. 0:26depending on what you're using it for and what it is you're choosing. There's GW, there's AOD,
  7. 0:31and I know this isn't really a peptide, but oral versus injectable L-carnitine also very good, depending on how much you're using.
  8. 0:37Getting into bulking and mass building, I really love the CJC with the Ipamaralan. I love the IGF-1.
  9. 0:43I love the PEG-MGF. MK, not a peptide, but I mean, growth home security gorg, I guess it's decent, I prefer real GH.
  10. 0:51Is there like 100 different peptides? Yeah, there's a ton, but I typically always stick with the same like five to 10,
  11. 0:55because they're all proven to work, they've been used for years, and I don't typically see any crazy side effects.
  12. 1:00The only issue is that they cost a lot of money.

Peptide claims from a bodybuilding TikTok: what holds up?

Kodi DYEL

TikTok creator

15.0K viewsWatch on TikTok

Quick answer

This video recommends a mix of GLP-1 receptor agonists, thyroid hormones, beta-2 agonists, and growth hormone secretagogues for either fat loss or muscle gain, without distinguishing between FDA-approved medications, investigational compounds, and substances with documented safety concerns. Several compounds mentioned, including clenbuterol and GW-501516, carry serious cardiovascular and oncological risk signals that are absent from the creator's discussion. Any use of these compounds should involve a licensed clinician who can evaluate individual health status, contraindications, and appropriate monitoring protocols.

Video review standard

Clinical fact-check snapshot

FormBlends treats social health videos as a starting point, then checks the claim against medical context, source quality, safety limits, and whether licensed provider review belongs in the next step.

Peptide social video fact-checksMedical claim reviewProvider discussion

Evidence signal

Source-backed review

Regulatory reality

Access rules depend on the compound and patient situation

Safety screen

Viral claims can miss contraindications, dose escalation, medication interactions, and quality-control risks.

This page currently connects to 11 source-backed evidence items through visible references or structured citation data.

PubMed evidence trail

Research sources used to frame this page

For Peptide claims from a bodybuilding TikTok: what holds up?, FormBlends checks the page topic against primary trials, systematic reviews, guidelines, and current PubMed-indexed literature where available. These citations are context, not medical advice, proof of eligibility, or a claim that every study applies to every patient.

Provider decision path

Use local research to choose a safer review path

Direct answer

Peptide claims from a bodybuilding TikTok: what holds up? is best used to compare access, oversight, pricing, pharmacy quality, and patient support before starting care.

Evidence check

Directory pages should connect local intent with provider standards, pharmacy transparency, and practical next steps.

Safety check

Provider quality, pharmacy source, prescribing model, and follow-up support can matter as much as the medication name.

Next step

When you are ready, the get-started flow can collect the details needed for a prescription review instead of leaving you to guess.

Page-specific review note

What this exact clip is really saying

This FormBlends review is specific to "Peptide claims from a bodybuilding TikTok: what holds up?" from Kodi DYEL. We read the clip as a Peptide social video fact-checks claim about Peptide social video fact-checks, then separate the useful signal from what a short social video cannot prove. The page-specific claim focus is: This video recommends a mix of GLP-1 receptor agonists, thyroid hormones, beta-2 agonists, and growth hormone secretagogues for either fat loss or muscle gain, without distinguishing between FDA-approved medications, investigational compounds, and substances with documented safety concerns.

The reason this review is not generic is the source wording and the canonical claim label "peptides replying to officially nate teamdyel personaltrainer bodybui." In this clip, the useful excerpt is: "What are my favorite peptides when it comes to bulking versus cutting?" That wording changes the review because it points to Peptide social video fact-checks evidence, safety, and patient-fit context, not a one-size-fits-all protocol.

The source trail for this page is checked against Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity (2021), Effect of Continued Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo on Weight Loss Maintenance (2021), and Effect of Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Daily Liraglutide on Body Weight (2022), plus the creator's own wording. Peptide social video fact-checks decisions still need an eligibility review, medication-interaction screen, access check, and quality-control review before anyone treats a social clip as medical advice.

Retatrutide showed impressive phase 2 results but remains investigational with no approved use as of 2024, making it premature to recommend alongside established medications.
People who land here are usually comparing the Peptide social video fact-checks claim with [object Object].
The strongest next step is to compare the claim with FormBlends' Peptide social video fact-checks guide, evidence notes, and provider review path before acting.

Claim verdict

The useful answer behind this video

This page is built to answer the specific claim behind the clip, then separate what is useful from what still needs clinical context. That makes the URL more than a repost: it gives Google, readers, and AI retrieval systems a concise verdict with source and safety boundaries.

Claim being checked

This video recommends a mix of GLP-1 receptor agonists, thyroid hormones, beta-2 agonists, and growth hormone secretagogues for either fat loss or muscle gain, without distinguishing between FDA-approved medications, investigational compounds, and substances with documented safety concerns.

FormBlends verdict

Peptide social video fact-checks evidence, safety, and patient-fit context

Evidence strength

Source-backed review with clinical or regulatory citations.

Patient-safe next step

Compare the claim with FormBlends safety guidance and a licensed-provider review before acting.

What to do with this video

Use the clip as a claim to verify, not a treatment plan

What it helps with

  • This video recommends a mix of GLP-1 receptor agonists, thyroid hormones, beta-2 agonists, and growth hormone secretagogues for either fat loss or muscle gain, without distinguishing between FDA-approved medications, investigational compounds, and substances with documented safety concerns. Several compounds mentioned, including clenbuterol and GW-501516, carry serious cardiovascular and oncological risk signals that are absent from the creator's discussion. Any use of these compounds should involve a licensed clinician who can evaluate individual health status, contraindications, and appropriate monitoring protocols.
  • Semaglutide and tirzepatide have the strongest fat-loss evidence of any compound mentioned, backed by large phase 3 trials showing 15-22% mean body weight reduction (Wilding et al., 2021; Jastreboff et al., 2022, NEJM).
  • Retatrutide showed impressive phase 2 results but remains investigational with no approved use as of 2024, making it premature to recommend alongside established medications.

What it may miss

  • It may not cover eligibility, contraindications, medication interactions, lab history, or dose escalation.
  • Compound access, legal status, and product quality still need a separate safety check.
  • Social video captions rarely show the full evidence base behind a claim.

Best next step

Compare the claim against a FormBlends guide, safety page, and licensed-provider review before acting.

Start provider review

What You'll Learn

  • Semaglutide and tirzepatide have the strongest fat-loss evidence of any compound mentioned, backed by large phase 3 trials showing 15-22% mean body weight reduction (Wilding et al., 2021; Jastreboff et al., 2022, NEJM).
  • Retatrutide showed impressive phase 2 results but remains investigational with no approved use as of 2024, making it premature to recommend alongside established medications.
  • GW-501516 (Cardarine) was abandoned in clinical development due to multi-tissue cancer signals in animal studies. No dose has been established as safe for human use.
  • Clenbuterol is not approved for human use by the FDA and carries documented cardiac risks including tachycardia and arrhythmia. It is not a peptide and should not be grouped with peptide protocols.
  • AOD-9604 failed its phase 3 clinical trial for weight loss and lacks credible human evidence supporting its effectiveness as a fat-loss compound.
  • CJC-1295 and ipamorelin do stimulate growth hormone release in small studies, but controlled evidence for meaningful muscle gain in healthy, trained adults is thin.
  • Mixing approved medications, investigational compounds, banned substances, and research chemicals in one list without risk stratification is a meaningful disservice to an audience that may lack the context to distinguish between them.

Our take · Written by FormBlends editorial team · Reviewed by FormBlends Medical Team · This is not a transcript. It is our independent review of the video above.

What did @kodi_dyel actually say?

Kodi ran through two lists: one for cutting, one for bulking. For fat loss, he named clenbuterol, T3, T4, albuterol, tirzepatide, retatrutide, semaglutide, GW-501516 (Cardarine), AOD-9604, and L-carnitine. For bulking, he pointed to CJC-1295 with ipamorelin, IGF-1, PEG-MGF, and MK-677, while noting he prefers real growth hormone over MK-677. He also teased an upcoming peptide company with "crazy blends that nobody else has." Throughout, he acknowledged some of these aren't technically peptides and framed everything as personal preference based on years of use.

One thing worth flagging immediately: several compounds on his cutting list, specifically clenbuterol, T3, T4, and retatrutide, are not peptides at all. Clenbuterol is a beta-2 agonist. T3 and T4 are thyroid hormones. Lumping these together under "favorite peptides" misrepresents what these compounds are and how they work.

Does the science back this up?

Some of it does, some of it doesn't, and the gaps matter. The GLP-1 receptor agonists he mentioned, semaglutide and tirzepatide, have the strongest evidence base of anything on either list. Retatrutide is real but still in phase 2 trials. The bulking peptides have a thinner research record in healthy humans.

Semaglutide's weight loss data is well-established. Wilding et al. (2021, NEJM) showed 14.9% mean body weight reduction over 68 weeks in adults with obesity. Tirzepatide outperformed that in the SURMOUNT-1 trial (Jastreboff et al., 2022, NEJM), with up to 22.5% weight loss at the highest dose. These are legitimate findings. Retatrutide, a triple GIP/GLP-1/glucagon receptor agonist, showed up to 24.2% weight reduction in a phase 2 trial (Jastreboff et al., 2023, NEJM), but it is not approved anywhere as of this writing.

CJC-1295 with ipamorelin stimulates growth hormone release. The combination is widely used in anti-aging and performance contexts, but controlled human trials in healthy adults are scarce. IGF-1 and PEG-MGF have even less clinical support outside of specific medical conditions like growth hormone deficiency.

What did they get wrong (or right)?

Credit where it's due: he correctly identified that MK-677 and GW-501516 are not peptides, and he's right that real growth hormone has a more established pharmacological profile than MK-677 as a secretagogue. He also didn't overclaim, largely framing things as personal use rather than guaranteed results.

Where he went wrong: mixing thyroid hormones and beta-2 agonists into a "peptide" conversation without distinguishing their risk profiles is irresponsible for a creator with a platform. Clenbuterol is not approved for human use in the United States and carries documented cardiac risks, including tachycardia and arrhythmia (Goldstein et al., 1998, Chest). GW-501516 was abandoned by GlaxoSmithKline after it caused cancer in multiple animal tissue types in preclinical studies. Presenting it casually alongside AOD-9604 and L-carnitine, without that context, is a genuine problem.

AOD-9604 is sometimes marketed as a fat-loss peptide, but it failed to demonstrate significant weight loss versus placebo in its phase 3 clinical trial (Heffernan et al., 2001, J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab). Presenting it as a go-to is not supported by the evidence.

What should you actually know?

The legitimate compounds on his list, semaglutide, tirzepatide, and to a lesser extent the GH-releasing peptides, require medical supervision, proper diagnosis, and ongoing monitoring. They are not interchangeable, and none of them are without side effects. GLP-1 agonists carry real risks including nausea, pancreatitis, and potential thyroid C-cell effects based on rodent studies, though human thyroid cancer risk remains under investigation.

The bigger issue here is the framing. When an IFBB pro with 15,000 viewers casually lists clenbuterol and retatrutide in the same breath as L-carnitine, it normalizes a risk hierarchy that doesn't reflect reality. Retatrutide has no approved indication. Clenbuterol is outright banned for human use by the FDA. These distinctions matter.

If you are interested in any peptide or weight-loss compound, the right path is a licensed provider who can review your labs, health history, and goals. A TikTok list, even from someone with real-world experience, is not a clinical assessment.

Interested in GLP-1 or peptide therapy?

Get matched with licensed-provider review to help decide if it is right for you.

Free Assessment

About the Creator

Kodi DYEL · TikTok creator

15.0K views on this video

Replying to @officially.nate #teamdyel #personaltrainer #bodybuilder #fitnesstips #ifbbpro

Frequently asked questions

Quick answers based on this video and our medical team review.

What does the video say about semaglutide?

Semaglutide and tirzepatide have the strongest fat-loss evidence of any compound mentioned, backed by large phase 3 trials showing 15-22% mean body weight reduction (Wilding et al., 2021; Jastreboff et al., 2022, NEJM).

What does the video say about retatrutide showed impressive phase 2 results?

Retatrutide showed impressive phase 2 results but remains investigational with no approved use as of 2024, making it premature to recommend alongside established medications.

What does the video say about gw-501516 (cardarine) was abandoned in clinical development due to multi-tissue?

GW-501516 (Cardarine) was abandoned in clinical development due to multi-tissue cancer signals in animal studies. No dose has been established as safe for human use.

What does the video say about clenbuterol?

Clenbuterol is not approved for human use by the FDA and carries documented cardiac risks including tachycardia and arrhythmia. It is not a peptide and should not be grouped with peptide protocols.

What does the video say about aod-9604 failed its phase 3 clinical trial for weight loss?

AOD-9604 failed its phase 3 clinical trial for weight loss and lacks credible human evidence supporting its effectiveness as a fat-loss compound.

What does the video say about cjc-1295?

CJC-1295 and ipamorelin do stimulate growth hormone release in small studies, but controlled evidence for meaningful muscle gain in healthy, trained adults is thin.

Sources & references

Citations extracted from our medical team's review. Click any citation to search PubMed.

Educational use only. This fact-check is editorial content for general information. Nothing here is medical advice. Talk to a licensed provider about your specific situation before starting, stopping, or changing any supplement, peptide, or medication regimen.

Read More on This Topic

Our written guides go deeper with dosing details, comparison tables, and medical-team reviewed protocols.

Not medical advice. This video was made by Kodi DYEL, not by FormBlends. Our write-up above is an editorial review, not a medical recommendation. Talk to your doctor before making any decisions about medications or treatments.