All GLP-1 medications from licensed 503A compounding pharmacies Browse Products

Originally posted by @bhushan_namaslay on Instagram · 93s|Watch on Instagram
Full video transcriptClick to expand

Auto-generated transcript of @bhushan_namaslay's video. Quoted here for educational fact-check commentary; original creator retains all rights to the video content.

  1. 0:03You are the only one who can bring your soul for ages.
  2. 0:07No one ever has to.
  3. 0:08No one ever has to.
  4. 0:10No one has to say you.
  5. 0:11No one has to say you.
  6. 0:12It's really difficult for people or women to lose weight than men.
  7. 0:18Let me explain three reasons why this is the scenario.
  8. 0:22First, Balakaya, males have higher testosterone than Kumanyu.
  9. 0:28So, the Masan build-up of males are more than old.
  10. 0:32That is why the more the Masan, more Beevla and the fat space of more than the fiendits.
  11. 0:40Step number two, the ideal ranges of the artifact of the males and females is different because
  12. 0:47body fat is water, succulks, furtimity, the hormones, the cycles.
  13. 0:53So, it is there in place to make sure the survival of the Lumen Rish and third.
  14. 1:00We have a lot of food, food, food, food, food, food, food, food, food, food, food, food.
  15. 1:06Guys eat and the girls eat the same amount of food, let's say half of pizza.
  16. 1:11Guys, they'll actually end up burning more calories while they're eating it than girls
  17. 1:17because they're more Masan.
  18. 1:19So, one of all ideal foods, females have a hard time eating weight, but does that mean
  19. 1:26in mafu's net, mafu's net, mafu's net.
  20. 1:28They will lose weight, they just need more time, can lose weight than the ducks.

Is weight loss really harder for women? We fact-checked

Bhushan jagdale

Instagram creator

35.4K viewsView on Instagram

Quick answer

The video touches on testosterone's role in lean mass development and its downstream effects on resting metabolic rate, which is directly relevant to patients being evaluated for hormonal optimization. Women with clinically low testosterone, confirmed via serum testing, may experience reduced muscle protein synthesis and slower metabolic rate, outcomes that can be addressed through supervised hormonal protocols. Any discussion of testosterone's effect on body composition in women should occur in the context of a full hormonal panel, not based on fitness content alone.

Video review standard

Clinical fact-check snapshot

FormBlends treats social health videos as a starting point, then checks the claim against medical context, source quality, safety limits, and whether licensed provider review belongs in the next step.

TRT social video fact-checksMedical claim reviewProvider discussion

Evidence signal

Source-backed review

Regulatory reality

Access rules depend on the compound and patient situation

Safety screen

Viral claims can miss contraindications, dose escalation, medication interactions, and quality-control risks.

This page currently connects to 9 source-backed evidence items through visible references or structured citation data.

PubMed evidence trail

Research sources used to frame this page

For Is weight loss really harder for women? We fact-checked, FormBlends checks the page topic against primary trials, systematic reviews, guidelines, and current PubMed-indexed literature where available. These citations are context, not medical advice, proof of eligibility, or a claim that every study applies to every patient.

Provider decision path

Use local research to choose a safer review path

Direct answer

Is weight loss really harder for women? We fact-checked is best used to compare access, oversight, pricing, pharmacy quality, and patient support before starting care.

Evidence check

Directory pages should connect local intent with provider standards, pharmacy transparency, and practical next steps.

Safety check

Provider quality, pharmacy source, prescribing model, and follow-up support can matter as much as the medication name.

Next step

When you are ready, the get-started flow can collect the details needed for a prescription review instead of leaving you to guess.

Claim path

Keep researching this testosterone and trt video claims cluster

Best for searchers turning TRT social claims into a safer lab-backed provider discussion.

Page-specific review note

What this exact clip is really saying

This FormBlends review is specific to "Is weight loss really harder for women? We fact-checked" from Bhushan jagdale. We read the clip as a TRT social video fact-checks claim about Testosterone, then separate the useful signal from what a short social video cannot prove. The page-specific claim focus is: The video touches on testosterone's role in lean mass development and its downstream effects on resting metabolic rate, which is directly relevant to patients being evaluated for hormonal optimization.

The reason this review is not generic is the source wording and the canonical claim label "trt is it really harder for women to lose weight yes here s wh." In this clip, the useful excerpt is: "You are the only one who can bring your soul for ages." That wording changes the review because it points to Testosterone evidence, safety, and patient-fit context, not a one-size-fits-all protocol.

The source trail for this page is checked against Cardiovascular Safety of Testosterone-Replacement Therapy (2023), Testosterone therapy in men with androgen deficiency syndromes: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline (2010), and Functional testosterone deficiency in aging men: Clinical impact, diagnostic pathways, and treatment strategies (2026), plus the creator's own wording. Testosterone decisions still need an eligibility review, medication-interaction screen, access check, and quality-control review before anyone treats a social clip as medical advice.

Muscle burns roughly 3x more calories per pound at rest than fat tissue, which is why higher average male lean mass produces a metabolic rate advantage (Wang et al.
People who land here are usually comparing the Testosterone claim with WomensFitness, WeightLoss, and GenderDifferences.
The strongest next step is to compare the claim with FormBlends' Testosterone guide, evidence notes, and provider review path before acting.

Claim verdict

The useful answer behind this video

This page is built to answer the specific claim behind the clip, then separate what is useful from what still needs clinical context. That makes the URL more than a repost: it gives Google, readers, and AI retrieval systems a concise verdict with source and safety boundaries.

Claim being checked

The video touches on testosterone's role in lean mass development and its downstream effects on resting metabolic rate, which is directly relevant to patients being evaluated for hormonal optimization.

FormBlends verdict

Testosterone evidence, safety, and patient-fit context

Evidence strength

Source-backed review with clinical or regulatory citations.

Patient-safe next step

Compare the claim with FormBlends safety guidance and a licensed-provider review before acting.

What to do with this video

Use the clip as a claim to verify, not a treatment plan

What it helps with

  • The video touches on testosterone's role in lean mass development and its downstream effects on resting metabolic rate, which is directly relevant to patients being evaluated for hormonal optimization. Women with clinically low testosterone, confirmed via serum testing, may experience reduced muscle protein synthesis and slower metabolic rate, outcomes that can be addressed through supervised hormonal protocols. Any discussion of testosterone's effect on body composition in women should occur in the context of a full hormonal panel, not based on fitness content alone.
  • Men average 270-1070 ng/dL testosterone versus 15-70 ng/dL in women, a real and significant hormonal gap that affects average lean mass (Bhasin et al., 2010, NEJM).
  • Muscle burns roughly 3x more calories per pound at rest than fat tissue, which is why higher average male lean mass produces a metabolic rate advantage (Wang et al., 2010, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition).

What it may miss

  • It may not cover eligibility, contraindications, medication interactions, lab history, or dose escalation.
  • Compound access, legal status, and product quality still need a separate safety check.
  • Social video captions rarely show the full evidence base behind a claim.

Best next step

Compare the claim against a FormBlends guide, safety page, and licensed-provider review before acting.

Start provider review

What You'll Learn

  • Men average 270-1070 ng/dL testosterone versus 15-70 ng/dL in women, a real and significant hormonal gap that affects average lean mass (Bhasin et al., 2010, NEJM).
  • Muscle burns roughly 3x more calories per pound at rest than fat tissue, which is why higher average male lean mass produces a metabolic rate advantage (Wang et al., 2010, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition).
  • Women's essential body fat requirement is 10-13% versus 2-5% for men, driven by reproductive physiology, not poor fat-loss capacity.
  • Thermic effect of food scales with lean body mass, not sex directly. A woman who builds muscle through resistance training closes much of the calorie-burn gap men have at meals.
  • Roberts et al. (2020, Obesity Reviews) found that structured resistance training significantly narrows the sex-based fat loss rate difference over 12 weeks.
  • Women may actually oxidize more fat during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle, a metabolic advantage the video does not mention (Tarnopolsky, 2008, Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism).
  • If you suspect low testosterone or other hormonal issues are affecting your metabolism, a clinical panel is the starting point, not a fitness video.

Our take · Written by FormBlends editorial team · Reviewed by FormBlends Medical Team · This is not a transcript. It is our independent review of the video above.

What did @bhushan_namaslay actually say?

The creator made three claims: men have higher testosterone, which builds more muscle, which burns more fat; women have higher essential body fat percentages due to hormonal and reproductive needs; and when men and women eat the same meal, men burn more calories because of greater muscle mass. The overall conclusion was that women can still lose weight, they just need more time.

To be fair, the audio quality is rough and some terminology gets lost in translation, but the core arguments are identifiable. These are not fringe ideas. They show up constantly in fitness content. The question is whether the science actually supports them as cleanly as the video implies.

Does the science back this up?

Mostly yes, but with enough nuance missing that some women could walk away with the wrong impression about what they can actually control.

The testosterone-muscle-metabolism link is real. Men average 270-1070 ng/dL of testosterone versus 15-70 ng/dL in women (Bhasin et al., 2010, New England Journal of Medicine), and testosterone does promote muscle protein synthesis. Muscle tissue burns roughly 6 calories per pound per day at rest compared to roughly 2 for fat (Wang et al., 2010, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition). So yes, more muscle means higher resting metabolic rate.

On essential body fat, the American College of Sports Medicine puts women's essential fat at 10-13% versus 2-5% for men. That gap exists largely because of sex hormones, reproductive tissue, and breast tissue. This is not controversial.

The thermic effect of food claim, that men burn more calories digesting the same meal, is where it gets more complicated. Thermic effect of food scales with lean body mass and total metabolic rate, not sex directly. A woman with high muscle mass will have a higher thermic response than a sedentary man.

What did they get wrong (or right)?

The creator gets the broad strokes right but oversimplifies the mechanisms in ways that could mislead people.

Saying men burn more calories eating the same food than women because of muscle is close to accurate, but it treats sex as the independent variable when lean body mass is the actual driver. Research by Ferrannini (1988, Metabolism) showed thermic effect of food correlates with insulin sensitivity and lean mass, not sex per se. A woman who resistance trains and builds lean mass closes much of that gap.

  • Right: Higher male testosterone leads to greater average muscle mass.
  • Right: Women have higher essential body fat requirements due to reproductive physiology.
  • Right: Muscle mass increases resting metabolic rate.
  • Oversimplified: Framing the thermic effect gap as inevitable for all men versus all women ignores individual variation driven by training status and body composition.
  • Missing: Menstrual cycle phases affect substrate oxidation and appetite signaling. Women may actually oxidize more fat during the luteal phase (Tarnopolsky, 2008, Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism).

The conclusion, that women just need more time, is reasonable but also undersells what actually helps: progressive resistance training to close the lean mass gap.

What should you actually know?

Sex-based metabolic differences are real, but they are not destiny. The variables women can change, specifically muscle mass and training consistency, have a direct effect on metabolic rate and fat loss speed.

A 2020 study by Roberts et al. in Obesity Reviews found that when women follow structured resistance training programs, differences in fat loss rates between sexes narrow substantially over 12 weeks. The baseline disadvantage is real. The ceiling is not fixed.

If you are a woman struggling with fat loss, the hormonal environment matters, but it is not the only story. Sleep, protein intake (Stokes et al., 2018, Nutrients found women often under-consume protein relative to needs for muscle retention during a deficit), and training load are modifiable. Testosterone levels in women can also be clinically low due to conditions like hypothyroidism, PCOS-related hormonal dysregulation, or post-menopausal decline. If you suspect a hormonal issue is affecting your metabolism, a telehealth provider can run a basic panel. That is not the same as self-diagnosing from a fitness video.

The creator is right that women can lose weight. The framing that they just need more time is a bit passive. What they often need is a program built around their physiology, not a scaled-down version of what works for men.

Interested in GLP-1 or peptide therapy?

Get matched with licensed-provider review to help decide if it is right for you.

Free Assessment

About the Creator

Bhushan jagdale · Instagram creator

35.4K views on this video

Is It Really Harder for Women to Lose Weight? Yes. Here's Why 👩‍🦰 Think men and women lose weight the same way? They don't. Here are three science-backed reasons why women have a harder time, and w

Frequently asked questions

Quick answers based on this video and our medical team review.

What does the video say about men average 270-1070 ng/dl testosterone versus 15-70 ng/dl in women,?

Men average 270-1070 ng/dL testosterone versus 15-70 ng/dL in women, a real and significant hormonal gap that affects average lean mass (Bhasin et al., 2010, NEJM).

What does the video say about muscle burns roughly 3x more calories per pound at rest?

Muscle burns roughly 3x more calories per pound at rest than fat tissue, which is why higher average male lean mass produces a metabolic rate advantage (Wang et al., 2010, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition).

What does the video say about women's essential body fat requirement?

Women's essential body fat requirement is 10-13% versus 2-5% for men, driven by reproductive physiology, not poor fat-loss capacity.

What does the video say about thermic effect of food scales with lean body mass, not?

Thermic effect of food scales with lean body mass, not sex directly. A woman who builds muscle through resistance training closes much of the calorie-burn gap men have at meals.

What does the video say about roberts et al. (2020, obesity reviews) found?

Roberts et al. (2020, Obesity Reviews) found that structured resistance training significantly narrows the sex-based fat loss rate difference over 12 weeks.

What does the video say about women may actually oxidize more fat during the luteal phase?

Women may actually oxidize more fat during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle, a metabolic advantage the video does not mention (Tarnopolsky, 2008, Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism).

Sources & references

Citations extracted from our medical team's review. Click any citation to search PubMed.

Educational use only. This fact-check is editorial content for general information. Nothing here is medical advice. Talk to a licensed provider about your specific situation before starting, stopping, or changing any supplement, peptide, or medication regimen.

Read More on This Topic

Our written guides go deeper with dosing details, comparison tables, and medical-team reviewed protocols.

Not medical advice. This video was made by Bhushan jagdale, not by FormBlends. Our write-up above is an editorial review, not a medical recommendation. Talk to your doctor before making any decisions about medications or treatments.