What did @iknowforrest actually say?
The video features a 70-year-old man doing a 41-inch box jump, and the creator uses it to make a pointed argument: pain as you age is inevitable, but "you get to choose what type of pain you're going to be in." The core claim is that physical decline is largely a training problem, not an aging problem, and that starting exercise at any age can dramatically change your trajectory. No specific TRT or hormone claims are made here. This is straightforwardly a fitness motivation post.
To his credit, the creator doesn't promise a cure or sell a product. He's pointing at a real person doing a real thing and saying: look what's possible. That's a legitimate rhetorical move, even if it glosses over some important nuance about how representative that 70-year-old is of the general population.
Does the science back this up?
Mostly, yes. The research on exercise and aging is about as consistent as nutrition science gets, which is to say, more consistent than most. Resistance training and high-intensity exercise in older adults produces measurable improvements in muscle mass, bone density, balance, and functional capacity, and it does reduce pain from common sources like osteoarthritis and lower back dysfunction.
A 2019 meta-analysis by Beckwee et al. in the journal Pain Medicine found that exercise interventions significantly reduced pain and improved physical function in older adults with knee osteoarthritis. The oft-cited LIFE Study (Pahor et al., 2014, JAMA) showed that moderate physical activity in sedentary adults aged 70-89 reduced the risk of major mobility disability by 18% compared to a health education control. The point that "you don't train your body" is a driver of premature functional decline has real support in the literature. The claim isn't reckless. It's just incomplete.
What did they get wrong (or right)?
The creator gets the big picture right and the details sloppy. Saying someone "looks better at 70 than most 30 year olds" is pure anecdote. The 70-year-old doing a 41-inch box jump is a genuine outlier. Using him as the baseline expectation for what training can do is motivationally useful but epidemiologically dishonest. Most 70-year-olds who train consistently will not be doing plyometric box jumps at that height. They will, however, be significantly healthier, more mobile, and in less chronic pain than sedentary peers. That's worth saying on its own without inflating the ceiling.
The binary framing, "you're going to be in pain either way, you just choose which kind," also flattens real complexity. Conditions like rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, or spinal stenosis don't simply respond to training the way mechanical lower back pain does. Framing all chronic pain as a training deficit can delay appropriate medical care for people who need it. That's not a small caveat.
What should you actually know?
Exercise is genuinely one of the most powerful interventions for aging-related decline available, and it's underused. That part of the message is correct and worth amplifying. Research by Fiatarone Singh et al. published in the New England Journal of Medicine back in 1994 showed meaningful strength gains in nursing home residents aged 72-98 after resistance training, a finding that still holds up and still surprises people. The dose-response relationship between physical activity and reduced all-cause mortality extends well into older age groups (Stamatakis et al., 2018, British Journal of Sports Medicine).
But "age is not an excuse" as a slogan papers over the fact that aging involves real biological changes: sarcopenia accelerates after 60, connective tissue repair slows, and recovery windows lengthen. These aren't excuses. They're physiological facts that should inform how someone programs their training, not whether they train. If you're 55 with knee pain going up stairs, the answer probably isn't a 41-inch box jump. It might start with walking, progressive loaded squats, and getting your vitamin D and protein intake assessed.