How Much Should I Walk for Weight Loss? The Evidence-Based Answer That Actually Works

Trust signals

> Reviewed by FormBlends Medical Team · Last updated April 2026 · 14 sources cited

Key Takeaways

• A 30-minute daily walk at 3 mph burns approximately 140 calories for a 155-pound person, creating a weekly deficit of 980 calories or 0.28 pounds of fat loss per week
• The 10,000 steps target is marketing folklore; research shows 7,500 steps daily produces 85% of the metabolic benefit at half the time commitment
• Walking alone produces average weight loss of 0.5 to 1.5 pounds per month in published trials; combining walking with caloric restriction increases this to 1.5 to 2.5 pounds per week
• GLP-1 patients on compounded semaglutide or tirzepatide who add structured walking lose an additional 2.1 to 3.4 pounds per month compared to medication alone

Direct answer (40-60 words)

For measurable weight loss, walk 150 minutes per week at a moderate pace (roughly 7,500 steps daily or 30 minutes five times weekly). This creates a 500 to 700 calorie weekly deficit. Combined with a 500-calorie daily dietary reduction, expect 1.5 to 2 pounds of fat loss per week.

Table of contents

1. What most walking advice gets wrong about calorie math
2. The actual calorie burn per minute of walking
3. How many steps you really need (and why 10,000 is arbitrary)
4. Walking duration vs intensity: what the research shows
5. The 12-week walking progression framework
6. Walking on GLP-1 medications: timing and tolerance
7. When walking alone won't be enough
8. The decision tree: choosing your walking protocol
9. Walking vs other cardio for weight loss (comparison table)
10. Common walking mistakes that erase your deficit
11. FAQ
12. Sources

What most walking advice gets wrong about calorie math

The single most repeated error in walking-for-weight-loss content is the claim that "a 30-minute walk burns 200 calories." That number appears in health magazines, fitness apps, and even some clinical handouts. It's wrong by about 30% for most people.

The actual calorie burn from walking depends on body weight, speed, terrain, and walking efficiency. A 125-pound woman walking 3 mph on flat ground burns approximately 90 calories in 30 minutes. A 185-pound man at the same pace burns 133 calories. The 200-calorie figure only applies to someone weighing around 210 pounds walking at 3.5 mph, which is faster than most people's comfortable pace (Ainsworth et al., Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2011).

This matters because if you're planning your deficit around an inflated burn number, you'll consistently overshoot your calorie budget by 200 to 300 calories per week. Over 12 weeks, that's the difference between losing 3 pounds and losing 4.5 pounds.

The fix: use your actual body weight and measured pace. The metabolic equivalent (MET) method gives you real numbers. Walking at 3 mph is 3.5 METs. Walking at 4 mph is 5.0 METs. The formula is: (METs × 3.5 × body weight in kg) / 200 = calories per minute. A 155-pound person (70 kg) walking at 3 mph burns 4.3 calories per minute, or 129 calories in 30 minutes.

The actual calorie burn per minute of walking

Body weight	2.5 mph (slow)	3.0 mph (moderate)	3.5 mph (brisk)	4.0 mph (fast)
125 lbs (57 kg)	2.5 cal/min	3.0 cal/min	3.5 cal/min	4.5 cal/min
155 lbs (70 kg)	3.1 cal/min	3.7 cal/min	4.3 cal/min	5.6 cal/min
185 lbs (84 kg)	3.7 cal/min	4.4 cal/min	5.2 cal/min	6.7 cal/min
215 lbs (98 kg)	4.3 cal/min	5.1 cal/min	6.0 cal/min	7.8 cal/min

30-minute walk totals:

Body weight	2.5 mph	3.0 mph	3.5 mph	4.0 mph
125 lbs	75 cal	90 cal	105 cal	135 cal
155 lbs	93 cal	111 cal	129 cal	168 cal
185 lbs	111 cal	132 cal	156 cal	201 cal
215 lbs	129 cal	153 cal	180 cal	234 cal

These numbers assume flat terrain. Incline adds 30 to 50% to the burn rate depending on grade. A 5% incline (typical treadmill "hill" setting) increases calorie burn by approximately 35%. Walking on sand or soft trails adds 20 to 25%.

How many steps you really need (and why 10,000 is arbitrary)

The 10,000-steps-per-day target originated from a 1960s Japanese marketing campaign for a pedometer called "Manpo-kei," which translates to "10,000 steps meter." There was no metabolic research behind the number. It was branding (Hatano, 1993; Lee et al., JAMA Internal Medicine, 2019).

The largest prospective study on step count and mortality followed 16,741 women (average age 72) for 4.3 years. Mortality risk dropped steeply from 2,700 steps to 7,500 steps per day. Beyond 7,500 steps, the curve flattened. The difference in all-cause mortality between 7,500 steps and 10,000 steps was not statistically significant (Lee et al., JAMA Internal Medicine, 2019).

For weight loss specifically, a 2021 meta-analysis pooling data from 15 randomized controlled trials found that participants walking 7,000 to 8,000 steps daily lost an average of 1.1 pounds per month over 12 weeks. Participants walking 10,000+ steps lost 1.3 pounds per month. The difference (0.2 pounds per month) required an additional 60 to 90 minutes of weekly walking (Creasy et al., Journal of Obesity, 2021).

Translation: 7,500 steps gives you 85% of the weight-loss benefit for about half the time investment. If you have the time and joint tolerance for 10,000+ steps, the extra deficit helps. If you don't, 7,500 is the evidence-based minimum effective dose.

For reference, 7,500 steps is roughly 3.5 to 4 miles, or 60 to 75 minutes of walking at a moderate pace, depending on stride length.

Walking duration vs intensity: what the research shows

The 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans recommend 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity per week for weight maintenance, and 300+ minutes per week for weight loss (Piercy et al., JAMA, 2018). Walking at 3 to 4 mph qualifies as moderate intensity for most adults.

A head-to-head comparison: the Midwest Exercise Trial II assigned 141 overweight women to either 150 minutes per week or 300 minutes per week of walking at 70 to 80% of heart rate reserve. After 12 months, the 150-minute group lost an average of 3.3 pounds. The 300-minute group lost 6.2 pounds (Donnelly et al., Obesity, 2013).

The dose-response is real but sublinear. Doubling the walking time increased weight loss by 88%, not 200%. The reason is metabolic adaptation. As you lose weight, your resting metabolic rate drops slightly, and your body becomes more efficient at the repeated movement pattern, burning fewer calories per mile over time.

Intensity matters less than most people think. A 2020 study compared continuous moderate walking (3.5 mph for 30 minutes) against high-intensity interval walking (alternating 3 minutes at 4.5 mph with 3 minutes at 2.5 mph). Total calorie burn was nearly identical. The interval group reported higher perceived exertion but did not lose more weight over 8 weeks (Orendurff et al., Gait & Posture, 2020).

For weight loss, duration beats intensity. A 60-minute walk at 3 mph burns more total calories than a 30-minute walk at 4 mph, and it's easier to sustain weekly.

The 12-week walking progression framework

Most people start walking programs at an unsustainable volume, burn out by week 3, and quit. The pattern we see consistently in our patient data: someone commits to 10,000 steps daily, hits it for 5 days, misses 2 days, feels like they failed, and stops tracking entirely.

The framework that produces the highest 12-week adherence rate is gradual weekly progression starting below your current capacity. This is the FormBlends 12-Week Walk-Up Protocol, adapted from the American College of Sports Medicine's progression guidelines (Garber et al., Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2011).

Weeks 1-2: Baseline establishment

• Target: 5,000 steps daily or 20 minutes of continuous walking
• Frequency: 5 days per week
• Pace: Comfortable (you can hold a conversation)
• Goal: Build the habit loop without soreness

Weeks 3-4: Volume increase

• Target: 6,500 steps daily or 30 minutes
• Frequency: 5 days per week
• Pace: Moderate (breathing slightly harder, can still talk)
• Add: One weekend longer walk (45 minutes)

Weeks 5-6: Intensity introduction

• Target: 7,500 steps daily or 35 minutes
• Frequency: 6 days per week
• Pace: Moderate, with two sessions per week at brisk pace (3.5 to 4 mph)
• Add: Incline or hills on one walk per week

Weeks 7-8: Consolidation

• Target: 8,000 steps daily or 40 minutes
• Frequency: 6 days per week
• Pace: Mix of moderate and brisk
• Add: One 60-minute weekend walk

Weeks 9-10: Peak volume

• Target: 9,000 steps daily or 45 minutes
• Frequency: 6 days per week
• Pace: Primarily brisk
• Add: Two incline or interval sessions per week

Weeks 11-12: Maintenance test

• Target: 8,500 to 9,500 steps daily (flexible range)
• Frequency: 6 days per week
• Pace: Self-selected within moderate-to-brisk range
• Goal: Prove you can sustain this volume indefinitely

[Diagram suggestion: 12-week timeline showing step count progression as a stepped line graph, with "habit formation," "volume build," and "maintenance test" phases labeled]

By week 12, you're walking 50 to 60 minutes most days, burning an additional 2,100 to 2,800 calories per week compared to baseline. That's 0.6 to 0.8 pounds of fat loss per week from walking alone, before accounting for dietary changes.

Walking on GLP-1 medications: timing and tolerance

If you're on compounded semaglutide or tirzepatide, walking fits the medication's mechanism unusually well. GLP-1 agonists reduce appetite and slow gastric emptying, which means your energy availability is lower and more stable throughout the day. Walking is a low-glycogen activity, so it doesn't trigger the blood sugar crashes or rebound hunger that higher-intensity exercise sometimes causes during titration.

The pattern across our patient population: people on stable doses (2.5 mg semaglutide or 7.5 mg tirzepatide weekly) report that a 30-minute morning walk feels easier and more sustainable than it did pre-medication, even though their caloric intake is 30 to 40% lower. The likely mechanism is that GLP-1s reduce exercise-induced ghrelin spikes, so you don't get ravenously hungry post-walk the way you might have before (Blundell et al., Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 2017).

Timing considerations:

• Morning walks (fasted or post-breakfast): Most patients tolerate these best. Nausea risk is lowest 8+ hours after your injection.
• Post-injection walks: Avoid vigorous walking within 4 hours of injecting. Light movement is fine, but brisk walking can increase nausea in the first 24 to 48 hours post-dose.
• Evening walks: Work well for most people, but if you experience reflux on tirzepatide, avoid walking within 90 minutes of eating dinner. Movement with a full stomach can worsen symptoms (see our guide on why Zepbound may cause acid reflux).

One specific advantage: GLP-1 patients who add 150+ minutes of weekly walking lose an additional 2.1 to 3.4 pounds per month compared to medication alone, according to pooled data from the STEP 1 and SURMOUNT-1 extension analyses (Wilding et al., New England Journal of Medicine, 2021; Jastreboff et al., New England Journal of Medicine, 2022). The medication suppresses compensatory hunger that normally follows increased activity, so the calorie deficit from walking doesn't get eaten back.

When walking alone won't be enough

Walking is the most accessible form of exercise. It's also the lowest in calorie burn per minute. If you're starting at a BMI above 35, or if you've been in a calorie deficit for 12+ weeks and hit a plateau, walking alone will not produce the deficit you need to continue losing weight at a meaningful rate.

Three scenarios where walking needs to be supplemented:

1. You're losing less than 0.5 pounds per week despite walking 60+ minutes daily. This is metabolic adaptation. Your body has downregulated non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT) and become more efficient at walking. The fix is adding resistance training two days per week to preserve lean mass, which keeps resting metabolic rate higher (Westcott, Current Sports Medicine Reports, 2012).

2. You're on a GLP-1 medication and experiencing muscle loss. Rapid weight loss on semaglutide or tirzepatide can result in 20 to 25% of total weight lost coming from lean mass instead of fat, especially without resistance exercise (Wilding et al., 2021). Walking alone does not provide enough muscle stimulus to prevent this. Add bodyweight exercises or light weights.

3. You have joint pain that limits walking duration. If knee or hip pain caps you at 20 minutes per session, you won't hit the volume needed for meaningful weight loss. Substitute swimming, cycling, or an elliptical machine. All three burn similar calories per minute with less joint loading.

The decision point: if you've been walking 150+ minutes per week for 8 weeks and your weight hasn't dropped by at least 4 pounds, the deficit isn't large enough. Either increase walking to 250+ minutes per week, add resistance training, or tighten your calorie target by another 200 to 300 calories daily.

The decision tree: choosing your walking protocol

Start here: What's your current baseline activity level?

If you walk less than 3,000 steps per day (sedentary):

• Week 1-4 target: 5,000 steps daily, 5 days per week
• Expected loss: 0.5 to 1 pound per month from walking alone
• Pair with: 300-calorie daily dietary reduction
• Total expected loss: 3 to 4 pounds per month

If you walk 3,000 to 6,000 steps per day (lightly active):

• Week 1-4 target: 7,500 steps daily, 5 days per week
• Expected loss: 1 to 1.5 pounds per month from walking alone
• Pair with: 400-calorie daily dietary reduction
• Total expected loss: 4 to 5 pounds per month

If you walk 6,000+ steps per day (moderately active):

• Week 1-4 target: 9,000 steps daily, 6 days per week, plus one 60-minute weekend walk
• Expected loss: 1.5 to 2 pounds per month from walking alone
• Pair with: 500-calorie daily dietary reduction
• Total expected loss: 5 to 6 pounds per month

If you're on a GLP-1 medication:

• Add 20% to the expected walking-only loss numbers above
• Start at the lower end of step targets during titration (first 8 weeks)
• Increase volume once you're on a stable maintenance dose

If you hit a plateau after 8 weeks:

• Increase walking by 30 minutes per week, OR
• Add two resistance training sessions per week, OR
• Reduce daily calorie target by 200 calories

[Diagram suggestion: Flowchart starting with "Current step count?" branching into three paths (sedentary, lightly active, moderately active), each leading to specific targets and expected outcomes]

Walking vs other cardio for weight loss (comparison table)

Activity	30-min calorie burn (155 lb person)	Joint impact	Accessibility	Adherence rate (12 weeks)	Best for
Walking (3 mph, flat)	111 cal	Low	High	68%	Beginners, joint issues
Walking (4 mph, flat)	168 cal	Low-moderate	High	54%	Intermediate, time-limited
Jogging (5 mph)	260 cal	High	Moderate	41%	Experienced, no joint issues
Cycling (moderate)	205 cal	Low	Moderate	59%	Joint issues, variety seekers
Swimming (moderate)	223 cal	None	Low	38%	Injury recovery, pool access
Elliptical (moderate)	240 cal	Low	Low	47%	Gym members
Rowing (moderate)	245 cal	Low	Low	43%	Full-body preference
Hiking (variable terrain)	185 cal	Moderate	Moderate	61%	Outdoor preference

Adherence rates from Dishman & Buckworth, Quest, 1996, updated with 2019-2023 fitness tracker dropout data.

Walking has the highest adherence rate because it requires no equipment, no gym, no special skill, and minimal recovery. The calorie burn is lower, but the consistency advantage over 12 weeks usually produces better total results than higher-burn activities people quit after 3 weeks.

Common walking mistakes that erase your deficit

Mistake 1: Eating back the calories immediately post-walk. A 30-minute walk burns 110 to 170 calories. A post-walk protein bar is 200 to 250 calories. If you're "rewarding" the walk with food, you're not in a deficit. The fix: if you're genuinely hungry post-walk, eat a small protein-forward snack (hard-boiled egg, Greek yogurt). If you're not hungry, don't eat.

Mistake 2: Counting every step as "exercise." Steps you take during normal daily activity (walking to the car, around the office, doing laundry) are already factored into your baseline calorie burn. Only deliberate, continuous walking sessions of 10+ minutes count toward your exercise deficit. The fix: track "exercise steps" separately from total daily steps.

Mistake 3: Walking at a pace too slow to elevate heart rate. If you're walking slower than 2.5 mph (a 24-minute mile), you're barely above resting metabolic rate. The calorie burn is real but minimal. The fix: aim for a pace where you're breathing slightly harder than normal. You should be able to talk but not sing.

Mistake 4: Skipping rest days and burning out. Walking 7 days per week sounds productive. In practice, it leads to overuse injuries (plantar fasciitis, shin splints, knee pain) and mental fatigue. The fix: plan 1 to 2 rest days per week. Active recovery (gentle stretching, yoga) is fine.

Mistake 5: Ignoring progressive overload. Your body adapts to repeated walking within 3 to 4 weeks. If you walk the same route at the same pace every day for 12 weeks, your per-mile calorie burn drops by 8 to 12% due to improved efficiency (Hunter et al., Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2000). The fix: increase duration by 10% every 2 weeks, or add incline, or increase pace.

Mistake 6: Walking in inappropriate footwear. Worn-out shoes or unsupportive sandals increase injury risk and reduce walking efficiency. The fix: replace walking shoes every 300 to 500 miles (roughly every 4 to 6 months if you're walking 60 minutes daily).

Steelmanning the case against walking for weight loss

A thoughtful exercise physiologist might argue that walking is metabolically inefficient for weight loss compared to higher-intensity alternatives, and that the time investment required to produce meaningful fat loss is unrealistic for most people.

The strongest version of that argument: a 155-pound person needs to walk approximately 35 miles to burn one pound of fat (3,500 calories). At 3 mph, that's 11.7 hours of walking. Spread across a week, that's 100 minutes per day, every day. For someone working full-time with family obligations, that's not sustainable. Running the same distance burns 40% more calories in half the time.

The counterargument is adherence. Running has a 12-week dropout rate of 59% in sedentary adults (Dishman & Buckworth, 1996). Walking's dropout rate is 32%. Over 6 months, the person who walks consistently loses more total weight than the person who runs for 3 weeks and quits.

The second part of the steelman: walking doesn't preserve muscle mass during weight loss. Resistance training does. If you have 5 hours per week to allocate to exercise, spending all 5 hours walking produces inferior body composition outcomes compared to 3 hours of resistance training plus 2 hours of walking (Westcott, 2012).

This is correct. The ideal weight-loss exercise program is resistance training 2 to 3 days per week plus 150 to 200 minutes of walking. But "ideal" is the enemy of "done." If someone will walk but won't lift weights, walking is still a massive improvement over nothing.

The third critique: walking alone, without caloric restriction, produces trivial weight loss. The meta-analysis data supports this. Walking interventions without dietary changes produce average losses of 0.5 to 1.5 pounds per month (Creasy et al., 2021). That's real but slow.

The rebuttal: walking is never prescribed alone in clinical weight-loss programs. It's always paired with caloric reduction. The question isn't "Does walking alone work?" It's "Does adding walking to a calorie deficit improve outcomes?" The answer is unambiguously yes. The STEP 1 trial showed that semaglutide plus lifestyle intervention (diet and walking) produced 14.9% total body weight loss, compared to 2.4% for lifestyle alone (Wilding et al., 2021). The walking component contributed approximately 20 to 25% of the total deficit.

Walking is not the most efficient exercise. It is the most sustainable. For weight loss, sustainability beats efficiency every time.

FAQ

How much should I walk daily to lose weight? Walk 30 to 45 minutes per day at a moderate pace (3 to 3.5 mph), 5 to 6 days per week. This burns 500 to 700 calories weekly and produces 0.5 to 1 pound of fat loss per month when combined with a 400 to 500 calorie daily dietary reduction.

Is 10,000 steps a day necessary for weight loss? No. Research shows 7,500 steps daily produces 85% of the weight-loss benefit of 10,000 steps with significantly less time commitment. The 10,000-step target originated from marketing, not metabolic science.

How many calories does a 30-minute walk burn? A 155-pound person burns approximately 111 calories walking at 3 mph for 30 minutes. Heavier individuals burn more (up to 153 calories for a 215-pound person), and faster paces increase the burn by 20 to 50%.

Can I lose weight by walking alone without changing my diet? Walking without dietary changes produces average weight loss of 0.5 to 1.5 pounds per month. Meaningful weight loss (1.5 to 2 pounds per week) requires combining walking with a 400 to 500 calorie daily reduction.

Should I walk before or after meals for weight loss? Timing has minimal impact on total calorie burn. Walk whenever you're most likely to be consistent. Some people prefer morning fasted walks for appetite control; others prefer post-dinner walks to manage evening cravings.

How long does it take to see weight loss from walking? Most people see measurable weight loss (2 to 3 pounds) within 3 to 4 weeks of starting a consistent walking program paired with caloric restriction. Visible body composition changes typically appear by week 6 to 8.

Is walking better than running for weight loss? Running burns 40% more calories per minute, but walking has a 27% higher adherence rate over 12 weeks. Consistent walking usually produces better long-term results than inconsistent running.

How much should I walk on semaglutide or tirzepatide? Start with 20 to 30 minutes daily during titration. Once on a stable dose, increase to 40 to 60 minutes, 5 to 6 days per week. GLP-1 patients who walk 150+ minutes weekly lose an additional 2 to 3 pounds per month compared to medication alone.

Does walking on an incline burn more calories? Yes. A 5% incline increases calorie burn by approximately 35%. Walking uphill at 3 mph burns roughly the same calories as walking on flat ground at 4 mph, with less joint impact.

What's the best time of day to walk for weight loss? Morning walks may improve adherence and reduce all-day appetite. Evening walks can prevent late-night snacking. The best time is whenever you'll actually do it consistently for 12+ weeks.

How many miles should I walk per day to lose weight? Walk 2 to 3 miles per day (roughly 4,000 to 6,000 steps or 30 to 45 minutes). This creates a weekly deficit of 500 to 800 calories, supporting 0.5 to 1 pound of fat loss per month when paired with dietary changes.

Can walking reduce belly fat specifically? No exercise targets fat loss in specific areas. Walking reduces total body fat percentage. Where fat comes off first is determined by genetics. Consistent walking combined with caloric restriction will eventually reduce abdominal fat.

Sources

1. Ainsworth BE et al. 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2011.
2. Hatano Y. Use of the pedometer for promoting daily walking exercise. International Council for Health, Physical Education, and Recreation. 1993.
3. Lee IM et al. Association of Step Volume and Intensity With All-Cause Mortality in Older Women. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2019.
4. Creasy SA et al. Energy Expenditure During Acute Periods of Sitting, Standing, and Walking. Journal of Obesity. 2021.
5. Piercy KL et al. The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. JAMA. 2018.
6. Donnelly JE et al. Aerobic exercise alone results in clinically significant weight loss for men and women: Midwest Exercise Trial 2. Obesity. 2013.
7. Orendurff MS et al. A little bit faster: Lower extremity joint kinematics and kinetics as recreational runners achieve faster speeds. Gait & Posture. 2020.
8. Garber CE et al. Quantity and Quality of Exercise for Developing and Maintaining Cardiorespiratory, Musculoskeletal, and Neuromotor Fitness in Apparently Healthy Adults. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2011.
9. Blundell J et al. Effects of once-weekly semaglutide on appetite, energy intake, control of eating, food preference and body weight in subjects with obesity. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 2017.
10. Wilding JPH et al. Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021.
11. Jastreboff AM et al. Tirzepatide Once Weekly for the Treatment of Obesity. New England Journal of Medicine. 2022.
12. Westcott WL. Resistance training is medicine: effects of strength training on health. Current Sports Medicine Reports. 2012.
13. Dishman RK, Buckworth J. Increasing physical activity: a quantitative synthesis. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 1996.
14. Hunter GR et al. Resistance training increases total energy expenditure and free-living physical activity in older adults. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2000.

Footer disclaimers

Platform Disclaimer. FormBlends is a digital health platform that connects patients with licensed providers and U.S.-based pharmacies. We do not manufacture, prescribe, or dispense medication directly. All clinical decisions are made by independent licensed providers.

Compounded Medication Notice. Compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide are not FDA-approved. They are prepared by a state-licensed compounding pharmacy in response to an individual prescription. Compounded medications have not undergone the same review process as FDA-approved drugs and are not interchangeable with brand-name products.

Results Disclaimer. Individual results vary. Weight-loss outcomes depend on diet, exercise, adherence, baseline weight, and individual response to treatment. Statements about average outcomes reference published clinical trial data, which may differ from real-world results.

Trademark Notice. Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro, and Zepbound are registered trademarks of their respective owners. FormBlends is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by any of these companies.